Political TownHall Forum banner
1 - 20 of 90 Posts

· Administrator
Joined
·
67 Posts
Think he is crazy? yes. He will say anything to get people worked up, and keep watching his BS.

His big issue is the speed it traveled, Speeds of 100 to 150 MPH are not uncommon for the jet stream. Google maps says Montana to South Carolina is 2100 to 2200 miles. At 65 MPH (Driving), that is 33 hours. When I first heard about it, on Wed they said it was over Montana. So 48 hrs to reach South Carolina is not impossible.

We can learn more by watching it, and monitoring any radio emissions, then we can by shooting it down right away.

The whole balloon thing is a much to do about nothing. What are they distracting us from?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
It's true, it's just one of many distractions. Still, if a balloon on can travel that fast from that far then fine but explain how two or three different militaries from two or three different countries couldn't take it out and how they were able to track it but yet not able to see it and stop it sooner. 🤔
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
67 Posts
I am sure they tracked it from its source. They just did not say anything until it became public knowledge. You can bet that Japan investigated it long before it even got near Alaska.

Where did you get that anybody tried to take it out?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
It was in the news that Canadian and I think British military tried to shoot it out of the sky, in fact they said that the Canadian military hit it like 14 times or something crazy like that and it still didn't fall out of the sky apparently. It's all bullshit, it's how they fool the sheep and justify more war. War makes big money and wipes out lots of people for their 500,000,000 population cap. Win, win for them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
The Canadian military apparently dumped over 1000 rounds into the balloon and it didn't go down. Lol
They apparently tracked it all the way from China but waited until it got to Montana to do anything about it and dodging two militaries. Oh, and then it apparently just hovered over a military base in Montana and then drifted all the way out to the Atlantic Ocean in less than a day to be then shot out of the sky by one shot of the American military. Yeah, I got a bridge for sale - wanna buy it also? Lol
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Ah ha ! Them Canadian sharp shooters ! Too bad they didn't get it first. What about sending a jet to eliminate it ? Don't they have any of those ?
They apparently filled it full of holes but because the balloon is so thin, it wouldn't go down, "what?!?" I can't believe people believe this crap. So the Canadians filled the balloon full of 1000 holes but it still doesn't go down and the Americans take it out in one shot. 🤔
How convenient to "shoot it down" over the ocean where no one can confirm the balloon, lol. Nice. If the Canadian military fired over 1000 rounds into the balloon then wouldn't have all of the solar panels and spy equipment gotten destroyed? 🤔
I say: stop the insanity.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
Here's another clue as to why this is another hoax - the flight path of the balloon! They showed the flight path of the balloon over the continent's but the continent's are not situated like that.

They are situated like this....see a pattern? I think the the United Nations knows something that most don't....
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Oh, you're right, the news was talking about a balloon back in '98 but this balloon apparently still dodged our military and the British. If the balloon is travelling in the jet stream then how can it hover over a certain location and if they saw it over the Pacific Ocean then why didn't they shoot it down then or shoot it down over the vast majority of empty land over Alaska and B.C.?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
Humans are on the news also and they are real. Some things on the news are real, like an earthquake for instance but when it comes to stories like shootings, terrorist bombings, protests and even balloons or anything political, then it's nonesene. You can't believe everything you see and hear.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
76 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
Here's more evidence of CNN faking things. They claim to be in Baghdad but they are really on a set to look that way. This is just a few. I've seen mannequins disguised as humans, fake dead people and more. Government censorship is bad, it's next to impossible to find all of the other fake news clips. If the news clips are fake then why would they remove them? Why would they even care? Its because it's proof of their constant lies.

 
1 - 20 of 90 Posts
Top